Return to flip book view

www.jbessay.comORANGE PROGRAMPHILOSOPHY 11GRADES 7 - 8

Are you interested in exploring the depths of philosophical writing? J&B’s Orange Program is designed specically for budding philos-ophers (Grades 7-8) eager to enhance their writing skills by under-standing the core principles of philosophical argumentation and essay structure. Through three progressive levels, students learn how to craft compelling theses, develop detailed and coherent arguments, and engage in thoughtful analysis, all while practicing basic research and referencing techniques. The program offers interactive and enlightening Zoom lessons that bring the art of philosophical writing to life! Our Orange Program has three levels: I, II, and II.

WHY J&B’S ORANGE PROGRAM?1. To Cultivate a Mindset: We don’t just teach philosophy–we help cli-ents understand how philosophical thinking transcends every aspect of our lives, impacting essay writing in particular.2. To Think and Write Deeply: The best essays come from a strong, log-ical framework and deep insights; both of which our Orange Program instills young writers with to support their essay writing journeys.3. To Gain Recognition: We’re competitive: we help clients prepare for world-renowned philosophy competitions, such as the Interntional Philosophy Olympiad, allowing them to test their knowledge in a high-stakes setting and gain accolades.

MODULE I: WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? Target Group: Grades 7-8Prerequisites: Green Program Levels I-III or equivalentProgram Length: 1 monthLesson Time: 45 mins/lesson (20 mins. for instruction, 20 mins. for discus-sion & debate, 5 mins. for homework review & Q/A)Lesson Frequency: Meets twice a week Class Size: 1-on-1Mode: Distance LearningLearning Outcomes: • Can successfully engage in the Socratic method of discussion • Has a foundation in epistemology, ethics and ethical dilemmas • Gain advanced knowledge of argumentation and logical reasoningObjectives: • Gain an understanding of what philosophy is, why it is important, and how it helps us better understand the world in which we live • Review fundamental philosophical concepts • Practice engaging in philosophical discussions and debates by utilizing the Socratic method

Detailed Lesson Plans: Week 1a: Dening “philosophy”—what is it? Week 1b: The Socratic method—how to use it and why Week 2a: Debate & discussion—how to form a logical response to an argu-ment Week 2b: Writing Task #1 and in-class evaluation/feedback Week 3a: Dening “epistemology”—how do we know what we know? Week 3b: Dening “ethics”—what is your personal code of ethics? Week 4a: Ethical dilemmas—the Trolley Problem and the Prisoner’s Dilemma Week 4b: Writing Tasks #2 and #3 and in-class evaluation/feedback

MODULE II: PHILOSOPHICAL LOGICTarget Group: Grades 7-8Prerequisites: Module I or equivalentProgram Length: 2 monthsLesson Time: 45 mins/lesson (20 mins. for instruction, 20 mins. for discus-sion & debate, 5 mins. for homework review & Q/A) Lesson Frequency: Meets twice a week Class Size: 1-on-1Mode: Distance LearningLearning Outcomes: • Can argue points effectively through writing • Capable of debunking awed arguments in writing• Able to identify logical fallacies• Gain an understanding of multiple types of logical reasoning Objectives: • Review the basics of logical writing and argumentation• Practice creating sound arguments in written form • Gain advanced essay writing skills needed to inform, critique, and per-suade

MODULE II: PHILOSOPHICAL LOGICDetailed Lesson Plans:Week 1a: Distinguish between opinions and facts Week 1b: Learn how to prove your argument using premises and conclusions Week 2a: Testing arguments—are they valid? Week 2b: Writing Task #1 and in-class evaluation/feedback Week 3a: Inductive and deductive reasoning—what is the difference? Week 3b: What are fallacies? Week 4a: Recognize and reproduce types of logical fallacies Week 4b: Writing Task #2 and in-class evaluation/feedback Week 5a: Make refutable arguments based on a prompt Week 5b: Practice developing counterarguments Week 6a: Learn how to introduce supportive evidence Week 6b: Writing Task #3 and in-class evaluation/feedback Week 7a: Craft a philosophical thesis Week 7b: Learn how to logically organize your arguments Week 8a: Logical transitions—how do you make them? Week 8b: Writing Task #4 and in-class evaluation/feedback

MODULE III: PHILOSOPHICAL WORKSTarget Group: Grades 7-8Prerequisites: Module I & II or equivalentProgram Length: 3 monthsLesson Time: 45 mins/lesson (10 minutes for instruction, 30 minutes for discussion & debate, and 5 minutes for homework review & Q/A)Lesson Frequency: Meets twice a week Class Size: 1-on-1Mode: Distance LearningObjectives: • Critically review philosophical texts from philosophers such as Plato, Des-cartes, Kant, Bentham, and Sartre• Practice breaking down arguments from major philosophers• Apply your understanding of philosophical inquiry, ethics, and logic in writ-ing to form your own philosophical perspective(s)Learning Outcomes:• Can identify premises, conclusions, and arguments in writings from phi-losophers• Gain a strong understanding of how a logical argument is formed, defend-ed, and refuted• Gain a deeper understanding of how to apply philosophy to multiple disci-plines

MODULE III: PHILOSOPHICAL WORKSDetailed Lesson Plan: Week 1a: Reading Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”—what is it? Week 1b: Diagramming the “Allegory of the Cave” Week 2a: Discussing the problems with “Allegory of the Cave” Week 2b: Writing Task #1 and in-class evaluation and feedback Week 3a: Reading Descartes’ “First Meditation”—what is it? Week 3b: Breaking down “I think, therefore I am”—premises and conclusions Week 4a: Proving/disproving “I think, therefore I am” Week 4b: Writing Task #2 and in-class evaluation and feedback Week 5a: Reading Kant’s “Categorical Imperative”—what is it? Week 5b: Introduction to Kantian ethics Week 6a: Discussing the problems with the “Categorical Imperative” Week 6b: Writing Task #3 and in-class evaluation and feedback Week 7a: Reading Jeremy Benthan’s theory of utilitarianism—what is it? Week 7b: Discussing the pros and cons of utilitarianism Week 8a: In-class debate: Kant versus Bentham Week 8b: Writing Task #4 and in-class evaluation and feedback Week 9a: Reading an excerpt from Satre’s Existentialism is a Humanism Week 9b: What is existentialism? Week 10a: What is individualism and why is it important to existentialism? Week 10b: Writing Task #5 and in-class evaluation and feedback Week 11a: Overview of Plato, Descartes, Kant, Bentham and Sartre

www.jbessay.com