Return to flip book view
COMPARATIVEKleanVak2019RELEASE AGENTS APPLICATIONTRADITIONALMETHODKLEANVAKMACHINEVS
KleanVakCOMPARATIVE of COSTSAPPLICATION OF RELEASE AGENTS16 m²KLEANVAK machine75 m²vs TRADITIONAL(*) Noced average priceFREKOTE COST90 € - 5 Liters can(*)54 € for 48 m²1.13 € / m²3 LITERS of FREKOTEVARIOUS COSTSGLOVES / CLOTHS / MOP(*) Noced average priceMASKSWASTE MANAGEMENT0.35 € / m²(*)TOTAL PRICE1.48 € / m²1L 3L2L225 m²48 m²FREKOTETREATED AREAData collected from our customers(**) Noced average price225 m² (***)FILTERS CONSUMPTION(***) Average autonomy of 1 filter1 FILTER FCA700150 € for 225m²FILTERS COST150 € / unit0.6 € / m²FREKOTE CONSUMPTION1 Liter 1 Liter 1 Liter75 m² 75 m²225 m² (*)3 LITERS of FREKOTE(*) Average treated areaTOTAL PRICE0.84 € / m² FREKOTE COST90 € - 5 Liters can(**)54 € for 225m²0.24 € / m²3 LITERS of FREKOTEFREKOTE CONSUMPTION1 Liter 1 Liter 1 Liter16 m² 16 m²48 m² (*)3 LITERS of FREKOTE(*) Average treated area
KleanVakSUMMARY of the COMPARATIVEAPPLICATION OF RELEASE AGENTSData collected from our customersANNOUNCED TIMES AND COSTS ARE FOR A 3 m² CURRING TOOL VS48 minTRADITIONAL METHOD 48 minKLEANVAK METHOD5 min5 minCONSUMABLES COSTS TRADITIONAL METHOD1.48 € / m²KLEANVAK METHOD0.84 € / m²VSTime and costmay vary for larger or more complexcuring tools.importantTRADITIONAL METHOD 60 min60 min60 min8 min 3h 08minKLEANVAK METHOD 30 min30 minminimum values1 LAYER of FREKOTECURING TOOLMAINTENANCE TREATMENTminimum valuesCURING TOOLFIRST TREATMENT6 LAYERS of FREKOTE1 LAYER of FREKOTE6 LAYERS of FREKOTE
KleanVakCOMPARATIVE of TIMESAPPLICATION OF RELEASE AGENTSData collected from our customersANNOUNCED TIMES ARE FOR A 3 m² CURING TOOLTRADITIONAL METHOD RISKS RELATED TO CURING TOOLS TRANFERSThe KLEANVAK machine allows removing agent applicaon in the preparaon area. This avoid all the risks and inconveniences associated with the transfer of curing tools to the vapor extracon areas leaded by the old technique. The risks and me required by these transfers may vary according to the size of the tools and the distance between the preparaon and the vapour extracon areas.60 min60 min60 min8 min48 min48 min188 minminimum valuesCURING TOOLFIRST TREATMENT6 LAYERS of FREKOTE10 minTRANSFER TO THEEXTRACTION CABIN3 minx 6FREKOTE APPLICATION6 LAYERS10 minRETURN TO THEPREPARATION AREA10 minRETURN TO THEPREPARATION AREA25 minDRYING1 LAYER3 minFREKOTE APPLICATION1 LAYER10 minTRANSFER TO THEEXTRACTION CABINDRYING6 LAYERS25 minx 6minimum values1 LAYER of FREKOTECURING TOOLMAINTENANCE TREATMENTKLEANVAKMETHOD FREKOTE APPLICATION6 LAYERSINPREPARATION AREA30 min 5 min30 min5 minFREKOTE APPLICATION1 LAYERINPREPARATION AREAminimum valuesCURING TOOLFIRST TREATMENT6 LAYERS of FREKOTEminimum values1 LAYER of FREKOTECURING TOOLMAINTENANCE TREATMENT
KleanVakSUMMARY of the COMPARATIVEAPPLICATION OF RELEASE AGENTSData collected from our customersCOST AND TIME RESULTS ARE BASED ON REGULAR CURING TOOLS WITH A SURFACE OF ABOUT 3 m²TRADITIONAL METHOD 1 LAYER of FREKOTEAPPLICATION TIME 6 LAYERS of FREKOTEAPPLICATION TIMECONSUMABLES COSTSMOLDED PART AESTHETIC FINISHKLEANVAK METHOD - 1000 %- 600 %- 76 %QUALITY of the MOLDED PART Tradional FREKOTE applicaon and parcularly on complex curing tools, causes release agent deposit on the boom of the molds. This FREKOTE surplus generates white spots on the part. These "NON QUALITY" lead to an extra work or worse to an rejected part. The simultaneous release agent applicaon and vapors sucon, lead to an homogeneous and smooth layer, without any drips or deposit of FREKOTE on the curring tools (whatever the shapes of the surfaces to be treated). QUALITY of thePART KLEANVAKMETHOD CONSUMABLESCOSTS KLEANVAKMETHOD TREATMENTTIMES KLEANVAKMETHOD VS